Subject:

druggies, liars, and rumor-mongerers

Date:

Wed, 12 Mar 1997 00:19:59 +1300

From: Jim Legg <income@ihug.co.nz>

Organization:

Ekus UN-incorporated

To:

prj@mail.msen.com

 

Jim Legg presents an issue to an open discussion group on ruling elite.

 

ISSUE: "druggies, liars, and rumor-mongerers" - ABOUND ON THE INTERNET


Did Leslie Stahl on 60 Minutes give this impression as Patrick Sullivan

says? If so, then was she just doing a job any propagandist would do to

reach the target audience, i.e. manufacture a lie. Here is a simple

juxtaposed construction:-

-:If a teacher were to indoctrinate the following meme:-

"Doesn't class think a high proportion of those who were sixties rockers

are still druggies and aren't propagandists also liars and isn't being a

rumor-monger the same as being a liar; and so on."

 

Forgive me for thinking that after thirty repetitions that a majority of

religious, new-right, students in the class would agree. So while

conspiratologists are asking. "Isn't it Bill Clinton who started the

internet rumor about not inhaling?", I'd say Leslie has a point.

 


What follows is an empirical study of this issue that deals with the

psychopolitical propaganda of this meme to which the New Paradigms

Discussion Group is asked to participate.

 

I intend to follow this post with a geometrical juxtaposition of an

earlier post of Patrick Sullivan's on those other current threads about

"Paranoia = Communist Conspiracy."

My published juxtaposition is called

"Paranoia = Capitalism Conspiracy"


 

You can link to the home of my 24hr INGRID THOUGHT PROCESSOR test

site; - here and now.

http://ingridx.dynu.net/paranoia.html

This file you are reading with original comment from Chris Evans was at:-

http://psyctc.sghms.ac.uk/grids/ingrid96/juxta.html


 

"WARNING!! "

This test site was at St Georges which had funding dating from the origins of the Tavistock

Institute. -[ John Coleman's "Conspirator's Hierarchy." - book now dead

@Spies.com].

So I was obligated not to do any frank "advertising" of commercial concerns. I thought my home page freeware was a different matter, however. But just putting the URL here got me into trouble, even though this email didn't go astray. So I got my referee to view this email for the first and last time. It wasn't put up on the site at London University but was forwarded to prj@mail.msen.com because the referee deemed this text problematical from a political angle and its links weren't politically neutral.

-----------------------

Best,

Jim Legg http://ingridx.dynu.net

Man*Soul/Computer='See What You Think...'