Subject:
druggies, liars, and rumor-mongerers
Date:
Wed, 12 Mar 1997 00:19:59 +1300
From: Jim Legg <income@ihug.co.nz>
Organization:
Ekus UN-incorporated
To:
ISSUE: "druggies, liars, and rumor-mongerers" - ABOUND ON THE INTERNET
Did Leslie Stahl on 60 Minutes give this impression as Patrick Sullivan
says? If so, then was she just doing a job any propagandist would do to
reach the target audience, i.e. manufacture a lie. Here is a simple
juxtaposed construction:-
-:If a teacher were to indoctrinate the following meme:-
"Doesn't class think a high proportion of those who were sixties rockers
are still druggies and aren't propagandists also liars and isn't being a
rumor-monger the same as being a liar; and so on."
Forgive me for thinking that after thirty repetitions that a majority of
religious, new-right, students in the class would agree. So while
conspiratologists are asking. "Isn't it Bill Clinton who started the
internet rumor about not inhaling?", I'd say Leslie has a point.
What follows is an empirical study of this issue that deals with the
psychopolitical propaganda of this meme to which the New Paradigms
Discussion Group is asked to participate.
I intend to follow this post with a geometrical juxtaposition of an
earlier post of Patrick Sullivan's on those other current threads about
"Paranoia = Communist Conspiracy."
My published juxtaposition is called
"Paranoia = Capitalism Conspiracy"
You can link to the home of my 24hr INGRID THOUGHT PROCESSOR test
site; - here and now.
http://ingridx.dynu.net/paranoia.html
This file you are reading with original comment from Chris Evans was at:-
http://psyctc.sghms.ac.uk/grids/ingrid96/juxta.html
"WARNING!! "
This test site was at St Georges which had funding dating from the origins of the Tavistock
Institute. -[ John Coleman's "Conspirator's Hierarchy." - book now dead
@Spies.com].
So I was obligated not to do any frank "advertising" of commercial concerns. I thought my home page freeware was a different matter, however. But just putting the URL here got me into trouble, even though this email didn't go astray. So I got my referee to view this email for the first and last time. It wasn't put up on the site at London University but was forwarded to prj@mail.msen.com because the referee deemed this text problematical from a political angle and its links weren't politically neutral.
-----------------------
Best,
Jim Legg http://ingridx.dynu.net
Man*Soul/Computer='See What You Think...'